Separation of Church and State Home Page
Their Claim

Vine & Fig Tree's Anti Separation Page
Our rebuttal


The Hidden Agenda of
The "Separation of Church and State"
|| 1 || 2 || 3 || Part 4 || 5 ||


The Separationists attempt to disarm us with this question:
Do separationists want to eliminate religion from public life? Clearly they do.
Absolutely not. If separationism means anything, it is that people should have the freedom to act publicly on their religious beliefs without coercion from the state. But a Christian who teaches in a public school should not be allowed to have a Bible on her desk or be allowed to answer students' questions about her faith, even at lunch time. Peloza v. Capistrano Unified School Dist., 37 F.3d 517 (9th Cir. 1994)
Nevertheless, the First Amendment had the effect of forbidding anyone from using the government to pass sectarian legislation (i.e., legislation designed to establish religious belief by law). "Sectarian" and "religious" are not synonymous. The purpose of education, according to the Founders, was to teach religion. But there were not to be "secatarian," that is, advance the distinctive beliefs of one denomination over another. A purely Christian school can be "non-sectarian."

More truth comes out here.


Rebuttal Page Index

|| 1 || 2 || 3 || Part 4 || 5 ||

Anti-Separation Home



The
Christmas Conspiracy


Virtue


Vine & Fig Tree


Paradigm Shift


Theocracy


End The Wall of Separation
Mailing List

Enter your e-mail address:
Browse the Theocracy Archive
An e-group hosted by eGroups.com

Vine & Fig Tree
12314 Palm Dr. #107
Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240
[e-mail to V&FT]
[V&FT Home Page]